Pay First, Verify Later: Cruz Pounces

Man speaking into microphone, gesturing with hand.

A Biden-era rule that pushed taxpayer-funded childcare payments out the door before anyone proved kids even showed up is now squarely in Republicans’ crosshairs.

Quick Take

Sen. Ted Cruz and GOP allies introduced the Payment Integrity Act to require verified childcare attendance before federal funds are paid out.
The proposal targets a payment system Republicans say enabled “Minnesota-style” fraud, where “empty” daycare sites allegedly billed federal programs.
Supporters say the bill would reverse a 2024 Biden administration approach that allowed prepayments before verification.
Federal prosecutors have estimated the suspected Minnesota losses could be enormous, but key figures remain estimates rather than final adjudicated totals.

What the Payment Integrity Act would change

Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, joined by Sens. Mike Lee of Utah and Rick Scott of Florida, has introduced the Payment Integrity Act, a bill aimed at tightening how states distribute federal childcare dollars. The central change is straightforward: states would pay childcare providers based on verified attendance, not enrollment claims or advance payments. Supporters describe it as restoring basic controls to ensure federal funds cover actual services, not paperwork-only promises.

Ted Cruz Just Introduced a Bill That Would Make Life Hard for Welfare Fraudsters
https://t.co/tHyqaMfF1K

— Townhall Updates (@TownhallUpdates) February 14, 2026

The bill is framed as a direct response to allegations that a “pay first, verify later” system made it easier to exploit the federal Child Care and Development Block Grant structure. The proposal would effectively steer payments toward post-service reimbursement, forcing documentation to catch up to the money. Backers argue that taxpayers should not be underwriting a system where the government’s first move is to cut checks and ask questions after the fact.

How a 2024 rule became a political flashpoint

Republicans point to a 2024 Biden administration rule as the policy backdrop that made prepayment normal, even when child attendance had not been verified. That timing matters because it arrived during escalating concerns about waste and fraud in state-administered programs. The new bill would reverse that direction and push states back toward proof-based payouts, a move conservatives argue is common-sense stewardship in an era of high spending and persistent inflation worries.

The Payment Integrity Act also lands after a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing chaired by Cruz that focused on alleged fraud linked to Somali-connected daycare networks in Minnesota. Reporting and testimony highlighted examples of suspected “empty” daycare centers and questionable billing practices, including references to a Minneapolis location called Quality Learning Center. The available reporting emphasizes allegations and investigative claims, while the public record cited in the research does not show final court outcomes for every claim discussed.

What investigators say happened in Minnesota—and what’s still uncertain

The scale described in the research is staggering: federal prosecutors have estimated that as much as half of roughly $18 billion in Minnesota welfare spending across 14 programs may have been lost to fraud, with childcare fraud estimates reaching as high as $9 billion. Those numbers have fueled broader calls for controls, but they also require careful reading. The figures are presented as estimates tied to investigations, not as final audited totals across all programs.

Republican messaging has also connected the Minnesota case to broader national debates about welfare integrity and immigration policy. Separate legislative efforts referenced in the research, including bills focused on deportation consequences for benefit fraud and stronger recovery tools, show a wider push to treat fraud as both a fiscal and rule-of-law issue. The Payment Integrity Act is narrower than those immigration-focused proposals, but it fits the same governing philosophy: verify eligibility, document services, and stop rewarding systems that are easy to game.

Why the fight matters beyond childcare funding

For conservatives, the argument is less about bureaucracy and more about constitutional-style governance: limited government that does its core job competently, spends within guardrails, and respects taxpayers who fund these programs. When Washington allows money to flow before verification, it creates perverse incentives and invites abuse—especially in massive federal-state partnerships where accountability is often diffused. Supporters say the bill aims to protect low-income families too, because fraud drains resources from legitimate providers.

The immediate practical question is whether Congress will move the bill and whether states will resist new administrative burdens. Attendance verification can require more recordkeeping for honest providers, and the research does not include detailed cost estimates for compliance. Still, in a political climate shaped by backlash to Biden-era spending, loose oversight, and “trust the system” governance, the Payment Integrity Act is designed to make one point unavoidable: federal childcare dollars should follow real children, in real classrooms, for real hours.